fbpx
Sponsored by the law firm of Clay Taulbee Myers
CALL US: 404-949-8118

Rubin Pokey Bridges shot dead at Donnelly Courts Apartments

When a man is fatally shot at the Donnelly Courts Apartments could the owners of the complex be held civilly liable?

Police are investigating a homicide which occurred at the Donnelly Courts Apartments in the early morning of April 15, 2022.   A man in an SUV had crashed into a fence on the outer perimeter of the building, presumably after being shot.  This man was later revealed to be Rubin Pokey Bridges.  Police believe it likely that the man was shot by another occupant of the vehicle.  SWAT was called to the scene after a man barricaded himself in an apartment on the complex who may have been connected to the killing.  The name of any potential suspects has not been released

Georgia Negligent Security Law

Property owners who turn a blind eye to crime on their premises may be inviting more severe infractions by their negligence.  In Georgia, a landlord may be held civilly liable for violent crimes on their property if they fail to take reasonable measures to prevent foreseeable crimes.  Installing perimeter fencing with automatic gates, ensuring adequate lighting, placing visible security cameras, and even hiring onsite security are all examples of measures which may be deemed reasonable under the circumstances. 

A History of Negligence at the Donnelly Courts Apartments

Online reviews describe resident concerns over issues at the property, particularly pest infestations.  When conditions are poor at a complex despite being raised by residents, it is an indication that the owners may be similarly turning a blind eye to security concerns.  “Roach infested.  Air conditioning system broke down for weeks at a time.  Horrible experience,” writes one former resident.  “Right now September is approaching and already killed about 10 or 11 humongous cockroaches . . . I am ready to move out now!” Another reviewer wrote. 

Only Crime Victims Can Demand Justice

When apartment managers turn a blind eye to security issues on their premises, they are creating conditions which invite additional criminal activity.  While law enforcement can deal with the fallout and may apprehend the individual perpetrators of violent crimes, there is little they can do about the conditions present which give rise to criminal activity.  Under Georgia law, however, negligent landlords can be held accountable in a civil court.  The family of the victim may win a monetary judgment.  While such a judgment will not bring their loved ones back it can pay funeral expenses, replace lost income, and provide funds for relocating to a safer area.  Perhaps more importantly, such a judgment can incentivize landlords to make the changes necessary to keep their properties safe for all residents.  In this way, together, we can Make Atlanta Safe, one community at a time.

We believe that when violent crime occurs on a property, the owners and management should be held accountable if they were aware of the risk, if they failed to warn patrons and guests, and if they did not implement reasonable security measures. The law is on our side. But only the survivors of violent crimes and the families of victims can stand up and demand justice. We can help.

It is up to survivors and their families to demand justice.

Only the survivors of violent crimes or the families of victims can use the civil court system to hold property owners and managers accountable when they fail to take reasonable precautions to protect tenants and guests from known threats. By holding them accountable, we can motivate property owners to make meaningful changes to prevent violent crime from happening to others. In that way, together, we can help Make Atlanta Safe.

We can't help unless you contact us. We're at 404.998.5258.

Contact Us

CALL US: 404-949-8118

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.